I do believe that it is. Indian leadership has first used foreign aid to raise the country out of terrible poverty, and then stand on its own two feet. An arms race was under way. By its own admission, the Rwanda government bankrupted its economy to pay for those weapons. Consequently, both peace and war provide benefits for foreign aid but also present difficult challenges.
The need for outside help arises when the parties to a conflict are unable or unwilling to shoulder that responsibility.
In most cases, both approaches are used. The impact of armed conflict on people and systems vital to their survival can take different forms, as the following examples illustrate: India has also received a series of long-term financial money loans that had to be repaid and money grants that did not have to be repaid.
Arming genocide in Rwanda. In sum, foreign aid is a double-edged sword in times of war and peace. Light conventional arms sustain and expand conflict in a world increasingly characterized by nationalist tensions and border wars.
Aside from their direct effects on the individuals concerned, the consequences of these tragedies for local systems must also be considered: Rwanda was already one of the poorest nations in Africa.
That is not to say that India is completely out of poverty, as some sections of that huge nation are still "backward" and impoverished Sachs,p.
The Soviet Union, the Cold War enemy of the United States, also developed aid programs to help developing nations and to help itself. Peace has both positive and negative effects on foreign aid to India. The civil war took place in Rwanda between and and subsequently spread to the DRC and caused enormous loss in human capital through countless victims.
Through I outright aid, investments, loans and grants, industrialized countries sought to help underdeveloped countries recover from the devastation of war. For example, aid is primarily intended to prevent the disastrous consequences mentioned above by stepping in before the health of the victims of conflict deteriorates.
Discuss whether or not the extension of foreign aid has successfully reduced poverty and the incidence of warfare in India. But aid should also be designed to prevent the growth of dependence on outside assistance.
Malnutrition, illness, wounds, torture, harassment of specific groups within the population, disappearances, extra-judicial executions and the forcible displacement of people are all found in many armed conflicts.
Unfortunately for all involved, while foreign aid is crucial for the development of Rwanda and to lift it out of poverty, this same foreign aid is actually perpetuating the crisis. Any successful aid strategy will have different goals.
Excerpt from Research Paper: Though much of the early Foreign Aid was a multinational effort, it was also given by individual nations for their own purposes. As industrialized nations, such as the United States, sought to assist developing countries, those donor nations also sought to increase their power and influence throughout the world.
Frank Smith Independent Journalist since Although both the government and guerrillas had limited resources with which to buy arms, and their combined 45, combatants never comprised a very large market, arms suppliers rushed to both sides like vultures to a carcass. War also has positive and negative effects on foreign aid in India.
Problems arise primarily due to the institutional cultures and organizational dynamics of donor agencies, which are not geared to dealing with the needs of deeply divided societies.
Analyze the specific actions that the leadership of India has taken, through the use of its foreign aid from donor nations and international lending institutions, to relieve the severe problems caused by warfare.
Support response with concrete examples of each of the results cited. However, aid that flows to that government has the perverse effect of enabling this group to keep control even when that control actually stems from purposefully limiting the development of the vast majority of the people in the country.
And the number of deaths of children under age 5 has plummeted in the last two decades from per 1, to While the results are not perfect, India has prospered in its economy and in the intimately connected areas of education, health, trade, research and development, steadily progressing in all those areas as charted by the OECD from through Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, This essay, The Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid, discusses that foreign aid encompasses technical, military, humanitarian and financial assistance.
Both the aspects of war and peace have heavily influenced the attraction and distribution of foreign aid among the sub-Saharan developing countries (Anderson, ).
This paper seeks to evaluate the positive and negative effects of the two aspects on foreign aid on a specific sub-Saharan country, in this case, Rwanda. From a global perspective, the presence or absence of peace or war determines the presence and distribution of foreign assistance, particularly in the developing nations.
War and peace have had various impacts as to how foreign aid is distributed in Nicaragua, as is going to be discussed in this paper. Foreign aid is an important part for financing the developmental programs of the developing countries.
It Is currently considered as an important instrument of the foreign policy of states. It acts as a major source of foreign exchange earnings for. Examined in this paper is the impact of peace and war on foreign aid distribution, specific actions undertaken by government officials to relieve problems resulting from warfare and the role of foreign aid in poverty and warfare reduction in India.
The Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid in Somalia Essay. The Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid in Somalia Rachel Gardner Professor Marco Mena Sociology of Developing Countries Strayer University 5/4/ The Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid Foreign aid plays a major role in the sustainability of economic and social .Download