Kantianism and act utilitarianism essay

For example, in Singapore, the Sikhs are a substantial minority in a population of mainly Chinese and Muslims. In the example above, it can be said that the Kantian response seems intuitively right as killing the healthy individual just because he can save ten other lives violates the goals of humanity.

In other words, you should always treat other rational beings persons as having absolute moral worth, or as the ultimate ends of action. I still view both Utilitarian and Kantian ethics as demanding, but after reading your post, I strongly favor Kantianism as Utilitarianism is far too demanding.

Based off your example, Kantian ethics would deem your actions taking cigarettes from people who are smoking not morally worthy. Hugh Phillis October 25, at 7: Sober, Core Question in Philosophy: For him, the prolonging of life in the vegetative state was not something pleasurable.

The question then is, what are you morally obliged to do? In this situation, what is the doctor morally obliged to do? According to this moral theory, decisions should have a basis on the benefits they can offer to the society Taking the categorical imperative in terms of being able to act in ways that can, without contradiction, become Kantianism and act utilitarianism essay universal law, if one were to universalize killing another person — which is the fundamental act in euthanasia — this would result in a practical contradiction.

According to this principle, circumstances, events, and actions that exhibit a high level of pleasure become the preferred options while those with low levels of pleasure are not preferable If the soldiers find out that Mr.

The first version was the universal law that defined that humans must act in a manner that qualifies categorization as universal. The hospital does not support passive euthanasia, and the court ruled in support of the hospital.

On the other hand, Kant postulated his theory, Kantianism that offers ethical guidelines that help people in making ethical decisions. As mentioned, actions likely to yield increased level of pleasure were preferable.

Rachel Sirotkin October 22, at 6: A combination of the two, or possibly other theories we are yet to learn, will make for a better ethical stance in my opinion. With Utilitarianism, the significant flaw in their position lies in the fact that it is built on the false assumption that the consequences of actions can be predicted, when in actuality they cannot.

And if one were to make an exception in this case, what would then prevent us from making exceptions in other cases? Murderers could justify their action by simply killing all of those who opposed them.

Euthanasia: Kantianism vs Utilitarianism Essay Sample

Tan and Kantianism and act utilitarianism essay family are residing, or you can admit that indeed — they are living with you. Moreover, Kant explained the value of dignity towards human beings.

The immoral will is heteronomous. Bonovich October 22, at Bentham formed the consequentialist utilitarian theory which evaluates the moral rightness of a decision based on its outcome, while Kant formed the deontological moral duty theory which evaluates the moral rightness of an action no matter what the consequence.

Such a being is thus an object of respect and, so far, restricts all arbitrary choice. For instance, it would be wrong to make false promises because we would be treating others as merely a means and not respecting them as persons with intrinsic value.

Deliberately killing another person is presumed by most rational people as a fundamental evil act. Maxwell Solasz October 21, at 6: There are ten dying patients in a small clinic in a village who have a rare blood disease and they urgently need blood transfusions from a healthy individual with blood type O.

Bentham reminds us that it is crucial to move from the total pleasure and pain experienced by one person to the total pleasure or pain experienced by all members of the community taken together. Mill opined that an ethical decision is one that translated to a measure of happiness and pleasure to people.

Saahil Papar November 2, at Human beings have dignity, because they are rational agents, capable of making their own decisions and guiding their conduct by reason. Therefore, an action that slightly increases your own pleasure, but in turn, dramatically decreases the pleasure of other, according to Utilitarianism is not moral action.

Viewed in the definition of Kant, human life deserves dignity and a regard as the end. Emily Wang October 31, at 9: Therefore, we have the duty of being good to all persons.

As people have commented previously, the best solutions to issues and dilemmas can be found by combining the different theories.

Therefore, the will determining why an individual carries out a certain action cannot receive underestimation in deontology. This maximizes the greatest happiness and utility for all Americans, and thus this makes the act of stealing tolerable.Utilitarianism vs.

Kantianism Ethics can be defined as "the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or refining those beliefs in some way." (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of human beings.

Utilitarianism v Kantianism Ethics can be defined as “the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or refining those beliefs in some way.” (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of human beings.

Utilitarianism is commonly found in two forms: act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism essentially states that everyone should perform that act which will bring about the greatest good for everyone affected by the act. Essay on Kantian vs Utilitarian Ethical Parameters - The task that stands before me in this paper is to address two situations and determine the ethical parameters in which a person should act.

Euthanasia: Kantianism vs Utilitarianism Essay Sample.

Utilitarianism vs. Kantian Ethics

The deliberate act of ending another’s life, given his or her consent, is formally referred to as euthanasia. Kantianism and Utilitarianism Euthanasia is one of the issues that different philosophers have discussed in length.

Utilitarianism v Kantianism

Euthanasia denotes any action that terminates the life of an individual in intense and debilitating medical state. Mill is one of the philosophers who described the moral theory of utilitarianism, an.

Download
Kantianism and act utilitarianism essay
Rated 5/5 based on 3 review