Collective Bargaining Explained Theory: In such manner, collective bargaining needs to be revised from time to time but avoiding frequent revisions will avoid unstable management of personnel. In this case, teams are represented by the company top management and the union.
The objective of the negotiation is to have at least a lasting negotiation contract between parties. A good agreement between parties must last at least longer than the recent dilemma of the case.
The company believes that the success of the new merged airline company is relying from the positive business unity between the two airline personnel. Trevis, Connelly, and Laszlo pp.
As the case reveals the endless argument between the two parties. Program on Negotiation newsletter at the Harvard Law School www. The League of Flight Attendants LFA has the big participation in the negotiation towards the company knowing that the LFA is the recognized body of the workers towards the company.
The new management must adhere to the clamor of the union granting the bargaining agreement being executed are all new since the two companies are merging. Board of Education US Dist. The objective of the union and the company must be realistic as to the long range revision of the collective bargaining agreement.
The company has to revise the contracts of the workers as to the new policy of the merged companies. One, is seek familiarity, not friendship, discuss differences in advance, and assign roles and responsibilities.
As the business merging operation prosper, labor management on the other hand confuses the labor union as to who will be in-charge in some merged work positions. As the two companies RCA and MCA are in their merging status, management dilemma between the two companies creates a havoc initiated by the labor union.
Furthermore, objectives must not be bias towards the company only or towards one group of personnel union.
The union is asking to permit the flight attendants to have pay during duty rigs. Both teams, the company and the union can utilize the three main techniques in thriving a conflict.
Based from the reading of the class, Reading 3. Email Other Apps Airline business expands more these days not only to the elite star alliance flights but also to the low cost airlines and small airline companies accommodating the middle income customers which has more volume of passengers during travel pick seasons.
The company is not dealing with one personnel but a body of personnel represented by the union. Amos Tversky Prospect theory covers the framing and loss aversion, Risk Seeking, Source dependence, escalation of commitment, and overconfidence.Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines: A union perspective2 - What did the union do to prepare for negotiations?
How did the preparation impact the. Airline Collective Bargaining: Reform or Reframe? Joshua M. Javits Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics and Policy Spring, The airline industry is bleeding. It is facing $30 billion in losses since “9/” Two airlines (United Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines) are in bankruptcy, one is just out of.
Discussion Question for Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines: A Union Perspective. What were the company’s primary objectives and strategies?
With over 55, free term papers we have the writing help you need. Become a better writer in less time! Case 4: Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines: A Union Perspective The case that we are discussing is a negotiation that happened between the League of Flight attendants and MCA negotiating team regarding the satisfaction of the employees of the terms of the contract that linked them to the company%(14).
Discussion Questions for Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines: A Union Perspective What were the union’s primary objectives and strategies?Download